I've always meant to make a video demonstrating the risk of a puffy coat in a car seat. I have been madly shooting and editing so that I could release the video just before the Kids in Motion conference at the end of this week -- and it's finally done!
I hope this is helpful to CPSTs, Instructors and everyone out there who tries to persuade parents, grandparents and caregivers NOT to harness children over their winter coats. Please share it as necessary, and let me know what you think!
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
Thursday, August 12, 2010
Awwww, Man! Bouncy Houses Pose Lead Risk
So bummed to read in today's New York Times that the vinyl used in bouncy houses contains unsafe levels of lead. Suggestion is to have children wash their hands and faces after playing!
Labels:
bouncy house,
lead,
summer dangers
Saturday, August 7, 2010
AUGUST Coupon Code: 25% Off (but only for first 8 customers)
It's hot as the dickens now, but make sure you're ready to keep your baby safe and warm -- without a hassle.
Be one of the FIRST 8 to enter coupon code AUGUST and save 25% off your ponchos and accessories!
DETAILS:
1. Offer valid on total purchases of any Car Seat Poncho merchandise. Limit one user per customer per mailing address. Can not be included with any other promotion or coupon. Shipping and handling charges apply. For non-US purchases, custom fees and duties may apply.
2. For questions, please email donna@hbarryboollc.com
Be one of the FIRST 8 to enter coupon code AUGUST and save 25% off your ponchos and accessories!
DETAILS:
1. Offer valid on total purchases of any Car Seat Poncho merchandise. Limit one user per customer per mailing address. Can not be included with any other promotion or coupon. Shipping and handling charges apply. For non-US purchases, custom fees and duties may apply.
2. For questions, please email donna@hbarryboollc.com
Labels:
car seat poncho,
coupon,
discount,
price,
winter coat car seat
Tuesday, August 3, 2010
Boosters: Put Your Hands on Your Hips
A lot of parents think that once their child is in a booster seat, all they have to do is put it in the car, buckle up the kid and hit the road. NOT SO FAST! Make sure the booster is doing a good job of positioning the seat belt!
How to tell? To start, "put your hands on your hips." THAT'S where the seat belt must cross -- on an adult OR a child, in order to properly restrain the body in a crash.
Whether in a frontal, rear or side impact collision, the body can be thrown in many directions. The seat belt retracts when the vehicle stops suddenly, and is designed to hold the body AT THE PELVIS (hard, bony, strong) and help the body "ride down" the crash forces.
If the belt crosses over the belly or the belly button, it is much too high. In a crash, the belt could crush soft vital organs like the liver, intestines, and kidneys as it restrains the body. A lacerations on the liver or tears in the bowel are serious, life threatening injuries. They can also change or impair the body forever, e.g., colostomy. There is also the risk of spinal injury, if the belt impacts the spine (after it's gone through all the soft-tissue organs mentioned above).
The shoulder belt should cross at the middle of the child's shoulder -- not on the shoulder joint and obviously not across the neck. Again, across the skeleton, not soft tissue.
So what's the best booster seat? Just as with car seats, the BEST booster seat is one that fits your child, fits your vehicle, and can be used correctly 100% of the time. Each child has his or her proportions -- long torso, wide shoulders, petite, etc., and back seats have many variations: bench, captain's chair, etc. Try out several at a big-box store (some will even let you test them in your car) and see which one(s) fit your child best. And whether you want to play "Simon Says" with your child or teach him the Time Warp, make sure to put your hands on your hips as a reminder!
Here's a terrific explanation of proper booster use, selection and fit, from CarseatBlog (official blog of the wonderful CarSeat.Org.
How to tell? To start, "put your hands on your hips." THAT'S where the seat belt must cross -- on an adult OR a child, in order to properly restrain the body in a crash.
Whether in a frontal, rear or side impact collision, the body can be thrown in many directions. The seat belt retracts when the vehicle stops suddenly, and is designed to hold the body AT THE PELVIS (hard, bony, strong) and help the body "ride down" the crash forces.
If the belt crosses over the belly or the belly button, it is much too high. In a crash, the belt could crush soft vital organs like the liver, intestines, and kidneys as it restrains the body. A lacerations on the liver or tears in the bowel are serious, life threatening injuries. They can also change or impair the body forever, e.g., colostomy. There is also the risk of spinal injury, if the belt impacts the spine (after it's gone through all the soft-tissue organs mentioned above).
The shoulder belt should cross at the middle of the child's shoulder -- not on the shoulder joint and obviously not across the neck. Again, across the skeleton, not soft tissue.
So what's the best booster seat? Just as with car seats, the BEST booster seat is one that fits your child, fits your vehicle, and can be used correctly 100% of the time. Each child has his or her proportions -- long torso, wide shoulders, petite, etc., and back seats have many variations: bench, captain's chair, etc. Try out several at a big-box store (some will even let you test them in your car) and see which one(s) fit your child best. And whether you want to play "Simon Says" with your child or teach him the Time Warp, make sure to put your hands on your hips as a reminder!
Here's a terrific explanation of proper booster use, selection and fit, from CarseatBlog (official blog of the wonderful CarSeat.Org.
Labels:
5-step test,
choosing a booster,
crash,
driving,
extended harnessing,
seat belts
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Drowning Doesn't Look (or Sound) Like You'd Expect
Most people who succumb to drowning do not flail their arms or shout for help. They usually go under silently. This excellent article on gCaptain (by and for maritime professionals such as but not including lifeguards) reminds us to keep our eyes AND our ears alert for each other this summer. Unlike what you'd expect, LACK of noise is the real red flag that someone is in trouble:
I became aware of this article on one of my local mommies' e-loops. It has apparently been shooting around on Facebook, but I'd never read it before. I guess I'm "injecting" it into my social media neighborhood. Of course, I hope none of us has these close calls this summer or ever, but I'm glad now to be aware and to share it with all of you and your loved ones.
"There is very little splashing, no waving, and no yelling or calls for help of any kind. To get an idea of just how quiet and undramatic from the surface drowning can be, consider this: It is the number two cause of accidental death in children, age 15 and under (just behind vehicle accidents) – of the approximately 750 children who will drown next year, about 375 of them will do so within 25 yards of a parent or other adult. In ten percent of those drownings, the adult will actually watch them do it, having no idea it is happening (source: CDC)."
I became aware of this article on one of my local mommies' e-loops. It has apparently been shooting around on Facebook, but I'd never read it before. I guess I'm "injecting" it into my social media neighborhood. Of course, I hope none of us has these close calls this summer or ever, but I'm glad now to be aware and to share it with all of you and your loved ones.
Monday, June 21, 2010
CBS, NHTSA: Babies Should Have Own Seats on Airplanes
As we head into the summer travel season, NHTSA issued an advisory for parents to buy their babies their own seats on planes. There several sobering moments in this story that aired recently on CBS' Early Show, but I gasped when a mother recounted losing hold of her 2 year old during a turbulent flight, and watched his body slam into the overhead cargo compartment. Thankfully the child did not suffer any permanent injuries.
Earlier this year, I compared holding a baby on your lap in an airplane to holding a baby in your lap on a roller coaster. Airplanes travel faster and higher than roller coasters, so what's crazy at 700 feet shouldn't even be allowed at 3,000 feet. And if babies are required to be in approved restraints when riding on the ground, shouldn't they be even more protected in the air?
For parents who do choose to buy seats for their children under the age of 2 (individual seats are required for anyone older), but want to lighten their loads: infant seats can be installed without their bases, and children 22-44 pounds can use the CARES Kids Fly Safe Travel Harness, which costs less than $75 and can fit in a tote bag.
Earlier this year, I compared holding a baby on your lap in an airplane to holding a baby in your lap on a roller coaster. Airplanes travel faster and higher than roller coasters, so what's crazy at 700 feet shouldn't even be allowed at 3,000 feet. And if babies are required to be in approved restraints when riding on the ground, shouldn't they be even more protected in the air?
For parents who do choose to buy seats for their children under the age of 2 (individual seats are required for anyone older), but want to lighten their loads: infant seats can be installed without their bases, and children 22-44 pounds can use the CARES Kids Fly Safe Travel Harness, which costs less than $75 and can fit in a tote bag.
Monday, June 7, 2010
Babies Forgotten in Cars: Continued
My post last week about a new invention prompted several comments here and on Car-Seat.org. The invention is intended to prevent parents from forgetting their children in their cars, which is potentially fatal in hot weather. Since it is a hot topic (forgive me; I could not resist the pun), I would like to continue the discussion this week:
In one post on the threat at CarSeat.org, umbrage was taken at my choice of term "offloading responsibility." I guess in that phrase I was imagining a type of person (who may or may not exist) who gets The Gizmo and takes the attitude "Now I don't have to think about forgetting my child, because if I did, my Giz would start beeping!" Satisfied at removing one more thing off his/her checklist, he or she could then go merrily on with his/her way. I meant it as an exaggeration, and hope/pray that this exact type of person does not actually exist.
Other people stated that, in the cases where the inthinkable has actually happened, the parent or caregiver was not in his/her usual routine (e.g., covering for the person who usually drives the child one place or the other) and it turned into a tragic mistake. There is usually no doubt in the minds of the authorities or family that the adult would ever have intentionally left the child in the car, but was this day he or she was out of sorts, not in the usual routine, or distracted, in an atypical, unexpected situation.
My concern is this: if these types of things usually happen in non-normal, unanticipated situations, who is this product for? To me, it seems like a Catch-22: Would a parent who thinks ahead enough to buy the Gizmo ever be the type to forget their child? Or, would a parent who is in such a distracted state remember to use the Gizmo?
On Car-Seat.org, safeinthecar liked the idea of "matching" bracelets that beeped or blared if child and parent were ever more than a certain distance apart. I like it, too. These would be useful in all kinds of situations (in public places, in crowds, as well as cars and parking lots). But again, when do you know WHEN to wear them? Some people get in and out of our cars all day with our kids -- does that mean we wear them ALL the time? How likely is it that we'll say, "I'm going to be forgetful today. Must remember the bracelets"?
I look forward to hearing your comments. I'm also going to send this thread to William Edwards, one of the NASA engineers who developed the keychain invention. Maybe he will chime in or find our thoughts of use!
Background Reading:
My Original Post
Comment thread on Car-seat org
In one post on the threat at CarSeat.org, umbrage was taken at my choice of term "offloading responsibility." I guess in that phrase I was imagining a type of person (who may or may not exist) who gets The Gizmo and takes the attitude "Now I don't have to think about forgetting my child, because if I did, my Giz would start beeping!" Satisfied at removing one more thing off his/her checklist, he or she could then go merrily on with his/her way. I meant it as an exaggeration, and hope/pray that this exact type of person does not actually exist.
Other people stated that, in the cases where the inthinkable has actually happened, the parent or caregiver was not in his/her usual routine (e.g., covering for the person who usually drives the child one place or the other) and it turned into a tragic mistake. There is usually no doubt in the minds of the authorities or family that the adult would ever have intentionally left the child in the car, but was this day he or she was out of sorts, not in the usual routine, or distracted, in an atypical, unexpected situation.
My concern is this: if these types of things usually happen in non-normal, unanticipated situations, who is this product for? To me, it seems like a Catch-22: Would a parent who thinks ahead enough to buy the Gizmo ever be the type to forget their child? Or, would a parent who is in such a distracted state remember to use the Gizmo?
On Car-Seat.org, safeinthecar liked the idea of "matching" bracelets that beeped or blared if child and parent were ever more than a certain distance apart. I like it, too. These would be useful in all kinds of situations (in public places, in crowds, as well as cars and parking lots). But again, when do you know WHEN to wear them? Some people get in and out of our cars all day with our kids -- does that mean we wear them ALL the time? How likely is it that we'll say, "I'm going to be forgetful today. Must remember the bracelets"?
I look forward to hearing your comments. I'm also going to send this thread to William Edwards, one of the NASA engineers who developed the keychain invention. Maybe he will chime in or find our thoughts of use!
Background Reading:
My Original Post
Comment thread on Car-seat org
Thursday, June 3, 2010
Babies forgotten in the car: a solution?
According to the New York Times, a team of NASA employees have developed a keychain alarm that sounds if a child is left in the car. Other companies are considering options like body-temperature monitors. Personally, I have concerns about the use of technology and gizmos to off-load plain old parental/caretaker responsibility. Thoughts?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





