Do tinted windows contribute to hyperthermia deaths for children left in closed vehicles?
According to David Bell, the inventor of the VizKid, they certainly don’t help. Tinted windows (now standard in the second and third rows of minivans and SUVs) are great for the comfort and privacy of backseat passengers, but they also make those passengers invisible. So if the driver or other adult leaves the car in a hurried or distracted state, he or she could not see the child from outside the car. Nor could anyone passing by -- people who could literally have been a life line for that child.
Bell’s invention, the VizKid, is a visual cue to drivers and passers-by that a child is in the back seat. After seating and buckling the child, the driver lifts the VizKid upright and buckles it into the front row passenger seat. Ideally, when the driver leaves the car and takes the child, the VizKid goes down again. If the driver is distracted when s/he exits the car, but sees the VizKid before walking away, tragedy avoided. If the driver does leave, someone else could see the VizKid in the front seat and rescue the child before it is too late.
Check out the VizKid and Visible Kids LLC here.
Showing posts with label how to remember your child is in the back seat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label how to remember your child is in the back seat. Show all posts
Monday, June 20, 2011
Sunday, June 19, 2011
Kids in Hot Cars, Part 1
Each year, about 40 children die from heat stroke (technically called hyperthermia) after being left behind in a motor vehicle.
An excellent study led by Jan Null, a meteorologist at SFSU, shows that hyperthermia does not just happen on blistering hot days. Even on a relatively mild day, the temperature inside an enclosed car increases 50 degrees within the first 30 minutes. In other words, a child left inside a car on a 70-degree day could soon be suffering in 120-degree heat.
Here is the link to the study data: http://ggweather.com/heat/index.htm#home
The full article, as published in Pediatrics: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/116/1/e109.full
I find the maps most fascinating. They show children hyperthermia deaths in almost every state (even North Dakota or Wisconsin) and almost every month of the year. Heart breaks, each and every one.
Related posts:
Babies Forgotten In Cars
Babies Forgotten In Cars, Continued
An excellent study led by Jan Null, a meteorologist at SFSU, shows that hyperthermia does not just happen on blistering hot days. Even on a relatively mild day, the temperature inside an enclosed car increases 50 degrees within the first 30 minutes. In other words, a child left inside a car on a 70-degree day could soon be suffering in 120-degree heat.
Here is the link to the study data: http://ggweather.com/heat/index.htm#home
The full article, as published in Pediatrics: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/116/1/e109.full
I find the maps most fascinating. They show children hyperthermia deaths in almost every state (even North Dakota or Wisconsin) and almost every month of the year. Heart breaks, each and every one.
Related posts:
Babies Forgotten In Cars
Babies Forgotten In Cars, Continued
Monday, June 7, 2010
Babies Forgotten in Cars: Continued
My post last week about a new invention prompted several comments here and on Car-Seat.org. The invention is intended to prevent parents from forgetting their children in their cars, which is potentially fatal in hot weather. Since it is a hot topic (forgive me; I could not resist the pun), I would like to continue the discussion this week:
In one post on the threat at CarSeat.org, umbrage was taken at my choice of term "offloading responsibility." I guess in that phrase I was imagining a type of person (who may or may not exist) who gets The Gizmo and takes the attitude "Now I don't have to think about forgetting my child, because if I did, my Giz would start beeping!" Satisfied at removing one more thing off his/her checklist, he or she could then go merrily on with his/her way. I meant it as an exaggeration, and hope/pray that this exact type of person does not actually exist.
Other people stated that, in the cases where the inthinkable has actually happened, the parent or caregiver was not in his/her usual routine (e.g., covering for the person who usually drives the child one place or the other) and it turned into a tragic mistake. There is usually no doubt in the minds of the authorities or family that the adult would ever have intentionally left the child in the car, but was this day he or she was out of sorts, not in the usual routine, or distracted, in an atypical, unexpected situation.
My concern is this: if these types of things usually happen in non-normal, unanticipated situations, who is this product for? To me, it seems like a Catch-22: Would a parent who thinks ahead enough to buy the Gizmo ever be the type to forget their child? Or, would a parent who is in such a distracted state remember to use the Gizmo?
On Car-Seat.org, safeinthecar liked the idea of "matching" bracelets that beeped or blared if child and parent were ever more than a certain distance apart. I like it, too. These would be useful in all kinds of situations (in public places, in crowds, as well as cars and parking lots). But again, when do you know WHEN to wear them? Some people get in and out of our cars all day with our kids -- does that mean we wear them ALL the time? How likely is it that we'll say, "I'm going to be forgetful today. Must remember the bracelets"?
I look forward to hearing your comments. I'm also going to send this thread to William Edwards, one of the NASA engineers who developed the keychain invention. Maybe he will chime in or find our thoughts of use!
Background Reading:
My Original Post
Comment thread on Car-seat org
In one post on the threat at CarSeat.org, umbrage was taken at my choice of term "offloading responsibility." I guess in that phrase I was imagining a type of person (who may or may not exist) who gets The Gizmo and takes the attitude "Now I don't have to think about forgetting my child, because if I did, my Giz would start beeping!" Satisfied at removing one more thing off his/her checklist, he or she could then go merrily on with his/her way. I meant it as an exaggeration, and hope/pray that this exact type of person does not actually exist.
Other people stated that, in the cases where the inthinkable has actually happened, the parent or caregiver was not in his/her usual routine (e.g., covering for the person who usually drives the child one place or the other) and it turned into a tragic mistake. There is usually no doubt in the minds of the authorities or family that the adult would ever have intentionally left the child in the car, but was this day he or she was out of sorts, not in the usual routine, or distracted, in an atypical, unexpected situation.
My concern is this: if these types of things usually happen in non-normal, unanticipated situations, who is this product for? To me, it seems like a Catch-22: Would a parent who thinks ahead enough to buy the Gizmo ever be the type to forget their child? Or, would a parent who is in such a distracted state remember to use the Gizmo?
On Car-Seat.org, safeinthecar liked the idea of "matching" bracelets that beeped or blared if child and parent were ever more than a certain distance apart. I like it, too. These would be useful in all kinds of situations (in public places, in crowds, as well as cars and parking lots). But again, when do you know WHEN to wear them? Some people get in and out of our cars all day with our kids -- does that mean we wear them ALL the time? How likely is it that we'll say, "I'm going to be forgetful today. Must remember the bracelets"?
I look forward to hearing your comments. I'm also going to send this thread to William Edwards, one of the NASA engineers who developed the keychain invention. Maybe he will chime in or find our thoughts of use!
Background Reading:
My Original Post
Comment thread on Car-seat org
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)